Eat My Cookies vs Super Agent
Super Agent is a polished consent automation tool with a good reputation. The main differences are around open source transparency and backend infrastructure.
| Feature | Eat My Cookies | Super Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✓ | ✗ |
| No Backend / No Cloud Component | ✓ | ✗ |
| No Tracking / No Analytics | ✓ | Unclear |
| Properly Rejects via CMP API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Accept All Automation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom Per-Category Preferences | ✓ | Limited |
| Per-Site Exceptions | ✓ | ✓ |
| Transparent Failure Warnings | ✓ | ✗ |
| CCPA Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| GDPR Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Activity Log & Badges | ✓ | ✗ |
| Language Support | 7 languages | Multiple |
| Cloud Sync for Rules | No (local only) | Yes (server-synced) |
| Price | Free (donations) | Free |
The cloud dependency question
Super Agent keeps its rules current by syncing from a server. This means it stays updated without you having to install extension updates — which is a genuine UX benefit. But it also means the extension phones home regularly. For a tool that exists to enforce your privacy preferences, that network dependency is worth weighing.
Eat My Cookies ships its rules with the extension itself. Updates come through the normal Chrome extension update channel — no additional network calls, no data leaving your browser between updates.
What Super Agent does well
Super Agent has a clean UI and solid consent automation for common platforms. It has good site coverage and a user-friendly setup experience.
Where Eat My Cookies differs
Eat My Cookies is fully open source (MIT licensed) — anyone can audit exactly what it does. It has no backend, no cloud component, and no corporate infrastructure. Every decision is made locally on your device.